IDAHO STATE BOARD OF REAL ESTATE APPRAISERS
Bureau of Occupational Licenses
1109 Main Street, Suite 220
Boise, Idaho
(208) 334-3233
Minutes of August 28-29, 2007
BOARD MEMBERS: Paul J. Morgan – Chair
Stanley Moe, Board Member
Rick Bachmeier, Board Member
Ed Morse, Board Member
Patricia Lentz, Board Member
BUREAU STAFF: Tana Cory, Bureau Chief
Roger Hales, Administrative Attorney
Emily Mac Master, Deputy Attorney General
Mike Gilmore, Senior Deputy Attorney General
Cindy Rowland, Investigator
Maria Brown, Technical Records Specialist I
ALSO PRESENT: Denise Graves, Appraisal Subcommittee
Kristi Klamet, Appraisal Subcommittee
Michael Hopkins
Kenneth Johnson
Meeting called to order by Board Chair, Paul Morgan at 9:00 a.m.
ROLL CALL
Paul J. Morgan - Present
Stanley Moe- Present
Rick Bachmeier- Present
Ed Morse- Absent
Patricia Lentz- Present
MINUTES
The Board reviewed the 6/5/2007, 7/24/2007, and 8/13/2007 minutes.
Moved by Ms. Lentz to approve the minutes as written. Seconded by Mr. Moe, motion carried.
BUREAU REPORT
Ms. Cory, Bureau Chief, introduced the Board to Ms. Cindy Rowland, Investigator. Ms. Rowland presented the Board with three charts outlining cases investigated between January 2007 and August 2007. Currently there is only one case over one year old under investigation. This is down from 21 cases over one year old in January 2007.
FINANCIAL REPORT
Ms. Cory presented the financial report which indicates a balance of $127,939.82 as of 7/31/2007.
INVESTIGATIVE REPORT
Ms. Cory presented the investigative report.
Fiscal Year 2008: To date, eight (8) complaints have been received, and sixty (60) CE audit files have been opened, for a total of sixty-eight (68) complaints. Of those, one (1) has been closed by Board action; thirty-eight (38) are pending legal review by the Office of the Attorney General; twenty (20) remain under investigation; and nine (9) await Board determination.
Fiscal Year 2007: Fifty-one (51) complaints were received, and one hundred-twenty-two (122) CE audit files have been opened, for a total of one hundred-seventy-three (173) complaints. Of those, thirty-six (36) have been closed by Board action; forty-three (43) have been closed subsequent to disciplinary action; thirty-one (31) are pending legal review by the Office of the Attorney General; thirty-eight (38) remain under investigation; and twenty-five (25) await Board determination.
Fiscal Year 2006: Twenty Nine (29) complaints were received. Of those, four (4) have been closed by Board action; five (5) have been closed following Board disciplinary action; eleven (11) are pending legal review by the Office of the Attorney General; one (1) remains under investigation; and eight (8) await Board determination.
Fiscal Year 2005: Thirty Five (35) complaints were received. Of those, eighteen (18) have been closed by Board action; eleven (11) have been closed following Board disciplinary action; and six (5) are pending legal review by the Office of the Attorney General.
Fiscal Year 2004: Thirty Nine (39) complaints were received. Of those, sixteen (16) have been closed by Board action; eighteen (18) have been closed following Board disciplinary action; four (4) are pending legal review by the Office of the Attorney General; and one (1) awaits Board determination.
Fiscal Year 2003: Thirty Two (32) complaints were received. Of those, twenty-two (22) have been closed by Board action; eight (8) have been closed following Board disciplinary action; and two (2) are pending legal review by the Office of the Attorney General.
Fiscal Year 2002: Thirty Two (32) complaints were received. Of those, twenty-three (23) have been closed by Board action; eight (8) have been closed following Board disciplinary action; and one (1) is pending legal review by the Office of the Attorney General.
For Board Determination:
Case number REA-P3-4-2004-10: Following review, it was moved by Ms. Lentz to accept the Bureau’s recommendation for closure. Seconded by Mr. Bachmeier, motion carried.
Case number REA-L3-2-2006-13: Following review, it was moved by Ms. Lentz to accept the Bureau’s recommendation for closure. Seconded by Mr. Moe, motion carried.
Case number REA-L3-4-2006-15: Following review, it was moved by Ms. Lentz to forward the case to the Attorney General’s Office for further review. Seconded by Mr. Bachmeier, motion carried.
Case number REA-L3-1-2006-18 & 19: Following review, it was moved by Ms. Lentz to accept the Bureau’s recommendation for closure. Seconded by Mr. Bachmeier, motion carried.
Case number REA-L1-1-2006-21: Following review, it was moved by Mr. Moe to accept the Bureau’s recommendation for closure with a cease and desist letter. Seconded by Ms. Lentz, motion carried.
Case number REA-L1B-1-2006-22: Following review, it was moved by Mr. Moe to accept the Bureau’s recommendation for closure. Seconded by Mr. Bachmeier, motion carried.
Case number REA-F3-2-2006-23: Following review, it was moved by Ms. Lentz to accept the Bureau’s recommendation for closure. Seconded by Mr. Bachmeier, motion carried.
Case number REA-F3-2-2006-24: Following review, it was moved by Ms. Lentz to accept the Bureau’s recommendation for closure with an advisory letter drafted by the Board and sent to the Board secretary to mail. Seconded by Mr. Moe, motion carried.
Case number REA-P3-1-2007-10: Following review, it was moved by Ms. Lentz to accept the Bureau’s recommendation for closure. Seconded by Mr. Moe, motion carried.
The following cases were reviewed:
REA-B6C-2-2007-79
REA-B6C-1-2007-80
REA-B6C-2-2007-84
REA-B6C-3-2007-88
REA-B6C-3-2007-95
REA-B6C-1-2007-97
REA-B6C-3-2007-98
REA-B6C-2-2007-108
REA-B6C-2-2007-111
REA-B6C-2-2007-113
REA-B6C-2-2007-119
REA-B6C-2-2007-123
REA-B6C-2-2007-124
REA-B6C-2-2007-127
REA-B6C-1-2007-136
REA-B6C-4-2007-140
REA-B6C-1-2007-142
REA-P5B-01-2007-157
REA-B6C-2-2007-160
REA-B6C-2-2007-162
REA-B6C-4-2008-12
REA-B6C-2-2008-13
REA-B6C-2-2008-15
REA-B6C-2-2008-41
REA-B6C-3-2008-43
Following review, it was moved by Ms. Lentz to accept the Bureau’s recommendation for closure of the above case numbers, with an advisory letter. Seconded by Mr. Bachmeier, motion carried.
The following cases were reviewed:
REA-B6C-2-2008-30
REA-B6C-2-2008-64
REA-B6C-1-2007-164
REA-B6C-1-2007-165
REA-B6C-2-2007-168
REA-B6C-1-2007-169
REA-B6C-2-2008-3
REA-B6C-2-2008-29
Following review, it was moved by Ms. Lentz to accept the Bureau’s recommendation for closure of the above case numbers with an advisory letter, and recommendation that the licensees obtain the required continuing education. Seconded by Mr. Moe, motion carried.
ATTORNEY GENERAL’S RECOMMENDATIONS
Mr. Mike Gilmore, Senior Deputy Attorney General presented a recommendation for case: REA-2008-38. After review the Board presented their recommendations to the Office of the Attorney General.
FORMAL DISCIPLINARY ACTION:
Mr. Gilmore presented the Board Stipulation and Consent orders for the following cases:
REA-2007-112
REA-2007-115
REA-2007-126
REA-2007-134
REA-2007-137
REA-2008-1
REA-2008-4
REA-2008-12
REA-2008-13
REA-2008-14
REA-2008-15
REA-2008-16
REA-2008-17
REA-2008-23
REA-2008-26
REA-2008-30
REA-2008-32
It was moved by Ms. Lentz to return the cases to the Attorney General’s Office for further review. Seconded by Mr. Bachmeier, motion carried.
Mr. Gilmore presented the Board a Stipulation and Consent Order for REA-2007-129.
It was moved by Mr. Bachmeier to accept the Consent Order REA-2007-129 and authorize the Board Chair to sign on behalf of the Board. Seconded by Ms. Lentz, motion carried.
Mr. Gilmore presented the Board a Stipulation and Consent Order for REA-2007-131.
It was moved by Ms. Lentz to accept the Consent Order for REA-2007-131 and authorize the Board Chair to sign on behalf of the Board. Seconded by Mr. Bachmeier, motion carried.
Mr. Gilmore presented the Board a Stipulation and Consent Order for REA-2007-139.
It was moved by Ms. Lentz to accept the Consent Order for REA-2007-139 and authorize the Board Chair to sign on behalf of the Board. Seconded by Mr. Bachmeier, motion carried.
Mr. Gilmore presented the Board a Stipulation and Consent Order for REA-2008-2.
It was moved by Ms. Lentz to accept the Consent Order for REA-2008-2 and authorize the Board Chair to sign on behalf of the Board. Seconded by Mr. Moe, motion carried.
Mr. Gilmore presented the Board a Stipulation and Consent Order for REA-2008-5.
It was moved by Ms. Lentz to accept the Consent Order for REA-2008-5 and authorize the Board Chair to sign on behalf of the Board. Seconded by Mr. Moe, motion carried.
Mr. Gilmore presented the Board a Stipulation and Consent Order for REA-2008-8.
It was moved by Ms. Lentz to accept the Consent Order for REA-2008-8 and authorize the Board Chair to sign on behalf of the Board. Seconded by Mr. Bachmeier, motion carried.
Mr. Gilmore presented the Board a Stipulation and Consent Order for REA-2008-18.
It was moved by Mr. Bachmeier to accept the Consent Order REA-2008-18 and authorize the Board Chair to sign on behalf of the Board. Seconded by Mr. Moe, motion carried.
Mr. Gilmore presented the Board a Stipulation and Consent Order for REA-2008-21.
It was moved by Mr. Moe to accept the Consent Order REA-2008-21 and authorize the Board Chair to sign on behalf of the Board. Seconded by Ms. Lentz, motion carried.
CONTINUING EDUCATION
The Board discussed a continuing education good faith effort. The Idaho Real Estate Appraiser Rules are clear concerning continuing education. Each licensee is required to obtain fifteen hours of continuing education every 12 months prior to license renewal. License renewal is the date the license is renewed, not the expiration date. This includes the requirement to attend a Board approved seven hour USPAP Update course once every two years. Registered Trainees are required to obtain 15 hours of continuing education 12 months prior to their 2nd renewal. The Board directed the Attorney General’s Office to use their discretion when evaluating a good faith effort. The Board noted that an Appraiser may take the 7 hour USPAP Update course each year and count it towards their 15 hour continuing education requirement. The Board also noted that an Appraiser may gain continuing education credit for a pre-licensure course taken for upgrading their license.
Mr. Paul Dehlin addressed the Board. He asked the Board to consider returning to the two year increment for continuing education. Mr. Dehlin stated that he would like to have his chapter of the Appraisal Institute involved in educating Idaho appraisers about the current continuing education requirements. He stated that attending the Board meeting has given him a better understanding of the process and agrees with the two tier system that the Board has implemented for discipline of continuing education non compliance. Mr. Dehlin is concerned with the language in the consent orders that notes perjury of the respondent. The Board took his comments under advisement.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
Moved by Mr. Bachmeier that the Board enter executive session to discuss stipulations and consent orders exempt from public disclosure per 9-340C, Idaho Code. Seconded by Mr. Moe, motion carried.
Moved by Mr. Moe that the Board enter regular session. Seconded by Ms. Lentz, motion carried.
The Board broke for lunch at 12:20 p.m.
The Board returned and called the meeting back to order at 1:15 pm.
MITIGATION HEARINGS
Roger Hales discussed the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommended Orders issued by the Hearing Officer for Case Numbers REA-2008-19, REA-2008-9, REA-2008-29, REA-2007-93, and REA-2007-96.
ATTORNEY GERNERAL’S OFFICE REPORT
Ms. Emily Mac Master, Deputy Attorney General, presented the prosecution report to the Board. The Attorney General’s Office is receiving a large number of continuing education cases from the Bureau which is consuming much of their time.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
Moved by Ms. Lentz that the Board enter executive session to discuss stipulations and consent orders exempt from public disclosure per 9-340C, Idaho Code. Seconded by Mr. Moe, motion carried.
Moved by Mr. Moe that the Board enter regular session. Seconded by Mr. Bachmeier, motion carried.
MITIGATION HEARINGS
REA-2007-96: Moved by Mr. Moe to adopt the Hearing Officers Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in the matter of Kenneth Richardson, License No. CRA-1068. That Respondents license shall be suspended for a period of thirty (30) days and he shall be required to pay the costs in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($250), and a fine in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($250). Seconded by Ms. Lentz, motion carried.
REA-2007-93: Moved by Mr. Moe to adopt the Hearing Officers Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in the matter of Lynn Reddekopp, License No. CGA-24. That Respondent shall be required to pay costs in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($250), and a fine in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($250). Seconded by Mr. Bachmeier, motion carried.
REA-2008-29: Moved by Mr. Moe to adopt the Hearing Officers Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in the matter of John Bryan Hickman, License No. CRA-768. That Respondent shall be required to pay costs in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($250), and a fine in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($250). Seconded by Ms. Lentz, motion carried.
REA-2008-9: Moved by Mr. Moe to adopt the Hearing Officers Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in the matter of Milon Neilson, License No. CRA-786. That Respondent shall be required to pay costs in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($250), and a fine in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($250). Seconded by Mr. Bachmeier, motion carried.
REA-2008-19: Moved by Mr. Moe to adopt the Hearing Officers Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in the matter of Matthew Merzlock, License No. LRA-415. That Respondent shall be required to pay costs in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($250), and a fine in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($250). Seconded by Mr. Bachmeier, motion carried.
APPRAISAL QUALIFICATIONS BOARD (AQB)
The Board discussed the new AQB requirements that pertain to all USPAP instructors after 1/1/2008. All USPAP instructors must be a state Certified Appraiser whose license is in good standing with a state that is compliant with Title XI. The Board is concerned with the language of the new requirements. Board directed Mr. Morse to draft a letter to the Appraisal Foundation with the Board’s concerns.
RECIPROCITY AGREEMENT
Board discussed the reciprocal agreement with the State of Montana.
It was moved by Mr. Moe to accept the reciprocal agreement with the State of Montana and authorize the Board Chair to sign on behalf of the Board. Seconded by Ms. Lentz, motion carried.
RENEWAL PROCESS
The Board discussed changing the renewal process to require that licensees include certificates of completion for their continuing education with the renewal application. The Board asked that this item be added to the October Board meeting agenda.
PROPOSED RULES
The Board reviewed the temporary and proposed rules and made additional changes.
Moved by Mr. Moe to accept the temporary and proposed rules after additional changes as requested by the Board and submit them for the 2008 Legislature Session. Seconded by Ms. Lentz, motion carried.
REAL ESTATE APPRAISER WEBSITE
The Board asked that the Real Estate Appraiser website state that beginning 1/1/2008 the new AQB exam will be given.
CORRESPONDENCE
The Board reviewed a letter from the Real Estate Commission.
The Board discussed a letter from Michael Van Sloten requesting clarification on applying for licensure through reciprocity. The Board directed the Board secretary, to check the State of Washington’s website for a list of reciprocal states. The Board would like to know if there is a reciprocal agreement with the State of California.
The Board discussed a letter from Pike Teinert requesting the Board approve courses that he has taken for pre-licensure. The Board directed the Board secretary, Maria Brown, to see if the courses Mr. Teinert has taken are approved for pre-licensure in the State of Washington.
The Board reviewed a letter from Zachary Moore requesting the Board allow the courses that he has taken to count for licensure. The Board stated that the courses submitted would count for licensure, but Mr. Moore would still be required to take core courses. The Board noted that Mr. Moore may count the courses taken as continuing education.
The Board reviewed a letter from Shane Black. The Board asked that Mr. Morse respond to Mr. Black’s letter.
PRO-REVIEWER
The Board reviewed Mr. Morse’s proposed guidelines for pro-reviewers.
It was moved by Mr. Moe to accept the guidelines for pro-reviewers, send them to existing pro-reviewers, and add them to the packets given to new pro-reviewers. Seconded by Mr. Bachmeier, motion carried.
DEPRECIATION CALCULATION EXAMPLE
The Board reviewed the current Depreciation Calculation Example on the website. The Board asked Mr. Rick Bachmeier and Ms. Patti Lentz to create two additional Jurisprudence Exam questions pertaining to cost approach. The applicant would still be required to show the Depreciation Calculation Example with each of their work samples. The Board asked the representatives of the Appraisal Subcommittee if it was appropriate to ask applicants to append the work samples to include the example. Ms. Graves stated that it is appropriate to ask an applicant to include a depreciation calculation example with their work samples.
The Board meeting adjourned at 5:15 p.m.
DATE: August 29, 2007
BOARD MEMBERS: Paul J. Morgan – Chair
Rick Bachmeier, Board Member
Stan Moe, Board Member
BUREAU PRESENT: Tana Cory, Bureau Chief
Budd Hetrick, Deputy Bureau Chief
Maria Brown, Technical Records Specialist I
ALSO PRESENT: Denise Graves, Appraisal Subcommittee
Kristi Klamet, Appraisal Subcommittee
The meeting was called to order at 8:30 a.m. by Chairman, Mr. Paul Morgan.
ROLL CALL:
Paul J. Morgan - Present
Stanley Moe- Present
Rick Bachmeier- Present
Ed Morse- Absent
Patricia Lentz- Absent
CORRESPONDENCE
The Board reviewed a letter from Michael Van Sloten.
The Board secretary reported that the State of Washington does have reciprocity with the State of California. The Board directed the secretary to draft a response letter to send after Mr. Moe reviews it.
The Board reviewed the letter from the Appraisal Subcommittee regarding enforcement of ASC Policy Statement 10.
The Board discussed sending USPAP books to all Idaho appraisers. The Board agreed that appraisers are given the USPAP books when they take the required 7 hour USPAP Update course and the expense was not warranted.
The Board secretary reported that the courses taken by Pike Teinert are approve for pre-licensure in the State of Washington. The Board directed the secretary to draft a response letter to send after Mr. Moe reviews it.
CE AUDIT
Board reviewed requested documents submitted by Mr. Kenneth Nuhn giving a synopsis of the courses that he had taken during his audit period.
Moved by Mr. Bachmeier to accept the courses submitted as meeting the continuing education requirement for Mr. Nuhn’s audit period with an advisory letter stating that those courses could not be counted as continuing education credit in the future. Seconded by Mr. Moe, motion carried.
Board reviewed CE Audits from 6/6/2007, 7/9/2007, and 8/6/2007. The Board also reviewed reinstatement audits, and documentation requested from licensees by the Board during previous Board meetings.
PROPOSED RULES
The Board would like to draft a rule stating a licensee cannot count two exact courses taken during a one year period for continuing education credit.
PL AND CE PROVIDERS
Moved by Mr. Moe to direct the Board secretary to draft and send a letter to all Idaho approved providers outlining the new educational requirements for providers as of 1/1/2008 and requiring them to submit the required documentation by that date or the course will be listed as expired. Seconded by Mr. Bachmeier, motion carried.
The Board reviewed the following provider course applications for continuing education approval:
APPRAISAL INSTITUTE 2007 WASHINGTON APPRAISAL SUMMIT
APPRAISAL INSTITUTE 2007 SHARED INTEREST GROUP
ALTERRA CONSULTING GROUP KEYNOTE / CHIEF APPRAISER PANEL
APPRAISAL INSTITUTE APPRAISING CONVENIENCE STORES
ALTERRA CONSULTING GROUP AVM FUNDAMENTALS
ALTERRA CONSULTING GROUP VALUATION VISIONARIES / APPRAISAL FRAUD
JVI APPRAISAL DIVISION LLC APPRAISING REO PROPERTIES
APPRAISAL INSTITUTE THE NOVEL CASE STUDY
APPRAISAL INSTITUTE WHAT COMMERCIAL CLIENTS WOULD LIKE
APPRAISAL INSTITUTE INTRODUCTION TO INTERNATIONAL VALUATION STANDARDS
MCKISSOK, LP PRIVATE APPRAISAL ASSIGNMENTS
APPRAISAL INSTITUTE SMALL HOTEL / MOTEL: LIMITED - SERVICE
APPRAISAL INSTITUTE VALUATION OF CONSERVATION EASEMENTS
APPRAISAL INSTITUTE FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS, MARKET VALUE,
DAVE SHOEMAKER STATISTICS, MODELING AND FINANCE
APPRAISAL INSTITUTE RESIDENTIAL MARKET ANALYSIS AND HIGHEST AND BEST USE
MCKISSOK, LP MORTGAGE FRAUD - PROTECT YOURSELF
APPRAISAL INSTITUTE CONDOMINIUMS, CO-OPS AND PUDS
APPRAISAL INSTITUTE COOL TOOLS: NEW TECHNOLOGY FOR REAL ESTATE APPRAISERS
APPRAISAL INSTITUTE EMINENT DOMAIN & CONDEMNATION
APPRAISAL INSTITUTE INTRODUCTION TO GIS APPLICATIONS FOR REAL
APPRAISAL INSTITUTE THE PROFESSIONALS GUIDE TO THE UNIFORM
APPRAISAL INSTITUTE BASIC APPRAISAL PRINCIPLES
APPRAISAL INSTITUTE REAL ESTATE FINANCE, STATISTICS, AND
APPRAISAL INSTITUTE BASIC APPRAISAL PROCEDURES
APPRAISAL INSTITUTE SCOPE OF WORK: EXPANDING YOUR RANGE OF SERVICES
Moved by Mr. Bachmeier that the Board approve the listed courses for continuing education. Seconded by Mr. Moe, motion carried.
The Board reviewed the following provider course application for pre-licensure approval:
DAVE SHOEMAKER STATISTICS, MODELING AND FINANCE
Moved by Mr. Bachmeier that the Board approve the listed courses for pre-licensure education. Seconded by Mr. Moe, motion carried.
AQB EXAM
Moved by Mr. Moe to allow any exam that is AQB approved to count for Idaho’s exam. Seconded by Mr. Bachmeier, motion carried.
APPRAISAL SUBCOMMITTEE
The Board met with Denise Graves and Kristi Klamet with the Appraisal Subcommittee. Ms. Graves explained to the Board who the Appraisal Subcommittee is and why they were formed. She explained the review process to the Board. Ms. Graves stated that she is very pleased with the progress that the Bureau and Board have made since her last review. Ms. Graves stated that the only concern that she has at this time is the high percentage of appraisers who are not in compliance with their continuing education. She stated that the Appraisal Subcommittee would like to see the Board’s secretary attend the AARO conferences as it will not only keep her up to date with any changes in licensing of appraisers, but it is a great resource in networking with other states. Ms. Graves asked if she could take copies of the Depreciation Calculation Example and the Guidelines for pro-reviewers to use as an example for other states. The Board and Bureau thanked Ms. Graves for all of her help and quick responses to emails.
The Board broke for lunch at 12:30 p.m.
The Board returned and the Chairman called the meeting back to order at 1:25 pm.
AARO CONFERENCE
Moved by Mr. Moe to send Maria Brown, Board secretary and Paul Morgan, Chairman, to the AARO conference and pay travel expenses. Seconded by Mr. Bachmeier, motion carried.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
Moved by Mr. Bachmeier that the Board enter executive session to review applications which is exempt from public disclosure per Idaho Code 67-2345 (1) (d). Seconded by Mr. Moe, motion carried.
Moved by Mr. Moe that the Board enter regular session. Seconded by Mr. Bachmeier, motion carried.
Motion made by Mr. Bachmeier to approve the following applicants for examination:
Natasha Hugo CRA
Carl Seymour CRA
Douglas Kizer CRA
Brian Theiler CRA
Benjamin Mendez CRA
Scott Watson CRA
Gregory Long LRA
Margaret Fisher LRA
Edison Hornung LRA
Kenneth Johnson LRA
Mike Hopkins LRA
Joshua Felton CGA
Seconded by Mr. Moe, carried.
Motion made by Mr. Bachmeier to deny the following applicants pending further information:
901056692
901042962
901030835
901066933
901067358
901047937
901042582
901094260
901094424
901042960
901081350
Seconded by Mr. Moe, carried.
The Board meeting adjourned at 3:50 p.m.